Sin and crime go hand in hand in the perilous world of the 21st century and create an immediate need to use the scriptures to establish, undo, and correct the crimes of the general laws that are sins and sins that are crimes. The last days that preceded Jesus ’imminent return to earth, as a lion for vengeance to mankind, are so much needed by Christian voices shouting“ repent for the kingdom of heaven, ”as was the voice of John the Baptist weeping repentance just before Jesus began his personal ministry in 1st century. Basic human immorality today is often not equated with the deeds and practices of the forbidden Ten Commandments, such as lying, lusting, and adultery, because these three vengeful acts are considered by most people in the 21st century world only instinctive human behavior and unworthy of judgment. People, especially politicians, will say that lying is necessary in a pragmatic world devoid of idealism in order to achieve political goals. Lying under oath, however, is a crime called a lie, which is almost never prosecuted in the courts of law in an extreme legal and legal society. Similarly, the lust for seeking or craving for something that does not belong to you constantly leads either to adultery, theft, or deception in order to hook or deceive to achieve what does not belong to a person, and these cardinal sins are now considered only human nature. Then, there are the sins against nature that have been and continue to be so awful that God probably thought that because of their shocking obviousness it was impossible for Him to include them in the written holy law. I suppose God created man and woman, hoping that by the free will given to them by wisdom they would choose to refrain from behaviors that would bring them pain, suffering, and rebuke.
At the very beginning of civil and criminal law legislation, applied to human civilization, there were certain human acts, behaviors, and practices that were considered contrary to natural law. Take for example Hammurabi’s code of ancient Babylonia, created around 1760 BC. The preservation of the natural heterosexual family was considered sacrilegious by Hammurabi and was the most important part of his Code. Adultery, incest and homosexuality were not tolerated in any way. Why was that so? Hammurabi explained that such unnatural acts serve to defile the family. If, therefore, a person has committed adultery, incest, or homosexuality, then he or she is punished by death by drowning. This could be due to the effect that Hebrew law had on the ancient world 4000 years before Hammurabi and, later, the birth of Christ.
The cogent parallel can be very clearly drawn between the cultural and legal changes that took place in pagan Greek and Roman civilization after 325 BC, before the 3rd century, Greece and Rome advanced in decadence and carnival during their cultural years before the coming of Jesus , on humanistic deviations from natural law (the practice of pedophilia, homosexuality, sodomy and bestiality towards unrequited lust). What happened after Rome, Greece, and all of Europe was Christianized by the apparent conversion of the Roman emperor Constantine to Christianity, around 325 BC. D., was a blend of Judeo-Christian morality with a pervasive Roman tradition, not a very sacred community. Nevertheless, homosexuality, pedophilia, sodomy, conspiracy, adultery, and bestiality were banned, and the Judeo-Christian Code, the Ten Commandments, applied to existing civil and criminal law because horrible sins became crimes and crimes were considered a sin. What we are now experiencing in the United States, in the early 21st century, is the mental and mental aberration of natural law that began to reappear in the late 20th century as a result of pagan philosophical humanism (as corrupt as it was in ancient Greece and Rome) arising from the social apathy of most American Christians and Jews. The ancient aberrant Greek and Roman branches, which stem from unnatural lusts such as pedophilia, bestiality, and a new psychosexual aberration called transsexualism (derived directly from homosexuality), have for nearly five decades become a creepy cultural morsel for the society of apathetic Christians and Jews. -sexual pathologies are clearly considered “the right of Americans to express themselves freely.” This normalized respect for sin and sexual crime in the late 20th century caused many Christian preachers, ministers, and evangelists to refrain from calling sin what is in God’s eyes to refrain from insulting sinners and human criticism of themselves. Perhaps this happened for hundreds of years with the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, as they became corrupt and wicked over time, to an inexorable point of return to piety, where complete destruction from God was required.
So how should 21st century Christians react to perpetrators of eternal wrathful sins and the crimes that result from such sin? To properly answer this question, let’s start with the basic unit of society, the family. Christian parents speak in the scriptures of the Holy Bible, especially in the New Testament. to be godly examples to their children, avoiding all evil, as Job did, as recorded in Job 1: 1 (NIV): “In the land of Uz lived a man named Job. This man was infallible and just; he feared in the version of King James Job is called “perfect and righteous before God,” but how do imperfect sinful human beings manage to cast out or avoid “all” evil according to the law of Christ? Well, first, there are no perfect, sinless people in the world in the 21st century, and there have never been such people on Earth since death, burial, and resurrection. The holy law, which consisted of the Ten Commandments, was, before Christ, mostly a measuring stick to external human behaviors. For example, although true honor to a father and mother, according to the fourth commandment, always came from a person’s mind and heart, the open deeds a person committed before Jesus ’death were those that were only important to God according to Holy Law at that particular time. In other words, the son or daughter actually despised the parents in their mind and heart, but still, if they acted as if they were honoring them with their outward expressions of honor, they met the requirements of the law. As another example, take the sixth commandment, which concerns adultery. The revealed act of adultery has always begun with thought or desire, but the Sixth Commandment, before the coming of Jesus, did not refer to a thought process, but only to a physical sexual one. A person could constantly long, with mind and heart, for the sexual pleasure of someone other than his wife or husband and not be guilty of adultery. Yet when mental desire turned into a physical act of sexual intercourse with someone other than a wife or husband, he committed adultery. There were two of the Ten Commandments, the Ninth and the Tenth, which were based entirely on thoughts and feelings. These two commandments included lust and lust. Craving was and is based entirely on the mental desires of the individual, and lust for, or for, the husband’s wife, or the wife’s husband, or for money, power, or any physical possession is only an extension of desire, or you want something of your own that does not belong you.
In essence, Jesus Christ will one day judge every saved Christian and every other unprepared non-Christian human being, for every empty thought and every deliberate act committed against the will of God, which is a much higher standard than that which existed for the people of the Old Testament world. This in no way takes away the salvation from sin by the grace that Jesus offered to all who believe in him. Jesus knows the content of all human minds and hearts and he will judge all Christians accordingly. So here we are in a 21st century world struggling with the same grave sins and crimes against nature that Adam, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had to catch up with. In short, there has never been such a morality as a new morality that would call empty awful sin good and pleasurable. Only old immorality raised its ugly head in much later times. As such, the 20th century produced, in apparently small but measurable steps, a degenerate nihilistic society of humanists who grabbed precious garbage produced by evil philosophers like Frederick Nietzsche and George Hegel, declaring that good and evil do not exist, but only a substantial means. to achieve pragmatic goals for heuristic purposes. And so it came to pass, with such ungodliness, that the world of the 20th century turned upside down with sins against nature that had been abomination since Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden of Eden.
Nevertheless, along with these age-old sins and crimes that reappeared in the modern century, came their ungodly suppliers who claimed that whoever dared to speak would be denied their inalienable and natural right to free human expression. Especially in a republic like the United States, which is based on Judeo-Christian principles, the Ten Commandments, the original 18th-century independent nation that became the United States in 1789, did not guarantee such sins and crimes as inalienable rights from the God of nature. The American people at the time considered homosexuality, transvestism, transsexualism, bestiality, pedophilia, adultery, and incest to be sins and crimes against nature. The moral government considered these abominations crimes, punishable by imprisonment, until, by aberration, they raised them politically from their base and bestial status to normalcy. From this legally permitted acquisition of evil, additional evil disintegrated with the proclamation of the highest court in the United States, such as the legalization of abortion on demand; killing late-born unborn children for their body parts, legalizing homosexual marriage and linking it as a sustainable way of life rather than as a psychosexual disorder that has been known for six thousand years; along the official legalized designation of a man who denies homosexuality as a psychological pathology.
As I said at the beginning of this article, I will repeat. As the coming of the Savior Jesus into the world of the 1st century required a prophetic voice, John the Baptist, preaching and calling sinners, regardless of earthly strength, wealth and position, to repentance, the world of the 21st century, more than two thousand years later, requires that sinners, arrogant and politically and socially powerful, openly and publicly call for repentance. Just as John the Baptist bravely and publicly accused Herod Antipas the Tetrarch, king of Judah and Maltaca, of adultery, without fearing for his life, just as the prophet Nathan bravely, in the name of God, accused David, king of Israel, of murder and adultery. , because of their sinful taking of Bathsheba, are not the Christian preachers, pastors, ministers, and evangelists whom the Lord Jesus said today to use the scriptures to proclaim sin when there is sin and to rebuke those who are sinners? I believe Jesus spoke through the Apostle Paul, when that great apostle said to his young friend Timothy, in 2 Timothy 3: 14-17 (KJV): “But continue in what you have learned and for whom you have been convinced, knowing whom that ye have learned them, and that ye have known from a child the scriptures, which are able to make you wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus: all the scriptures are inspired of God, and are profitable for doctrine, for repentance, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. : that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly equipped with all good works. ”Paul was sincerely trying to tell Timothy that the loss of life had no geographical consequences for the Lord; that dying for the Lord, as John the Baptist did, preaching the truth, would take the Christian into the presence of the Lord Jesus to live forever with the Savior. As Paul said of himself, in 2 Timothy 4: 6-8, “For I am now ready to offer myself, and the time of my departure is at hand. I have fought well, I have finished my journey, I have kept my faith: From now the crown of righteousness will be set for me, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will give me on that day: and not only to me, but to all who love his appearance, “so every true disciple of Jesus can proclaim at the moment of death.
Therefore, if presidents, kings, prime ministers, or queens are to be called to repentance, is it not the emphasized duty of men ordained by God in the Church of the Lord Jesus (Ephesians 4: 11-16), prophets (teachers), evangelists, pastors, and teachers to publicly, and in particular, accuse government leaders of the sin and crime that result from those sins, when their sins and crimes hide the deception of the public? Jesus taught his Gospel clearly and resolutely and told his disciples that they should recognize sin as the rotten fruit of an evil tree. “You will know them by their fruits,” Jesus said in Matthew 7: 16-17 (KJV), “You will know them by their fruits. Do people gather the grapes of thorns or the figs of thorns? then the rotten tree bears bad fruit. “Then in Matthew 7:19 (KJV) Jesus declared that” every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. “
Let us now turn to the details of sin and its senders, as the apostle stated in Ephesians 6: 11-12 (KJV). “Put on all the armor of God so that you may oppose the devil to the devil. For we do not fight against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against power, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” Paul used the word “Croats.” in this specific biblical context, making the opposition of evil to the disciples of Christ a proactive, almost competitive opposition, whereby sin is caused by the holy gospel of Jesus. Recently, a young Black Baptist pastor, whom I greatly admire and appreciate, told me that I was evil and that I was no longer his friend, because I dared to say that Barack H. Obama was an exhibitor as a declared Christian and a deviant homosexual Muslim (a true oxymoron). ). Furthermore, I told him that publicly undisclosed facts, if distorted and carefully studied, reveal that Michelle Obama was not born a woman, but a man, named Michael L. Robinson, in Chicago, Illinois, and later chose to become gay and reclassify herself. as a woman sometime after 1985, claiming to be transsexual. Moreover, these investigative facts also reveal that the two young women, whom Barack and Michelle Obama claimed as their natural child, were not born to Michael (Michelle) Obama, but were adopted after the marriage of Michael Robinson and Barack Obama. I tried to explain to my young friend that the U.S. media in the major media was involved in covering up these explicit facts and that the majority of the U.S. electorate (those U.S. citizens over the age of 18 and eligible to vote) who elected, and re-elected, Obama would as a U.S. president cognitively dissonant refuse to believe they had been deceived into choosing a homosexual and a transsexual into the White House.
Yet are there publicly observed facts and behaviors that would force a reasonable person to investigate more deeply the behavior of former U.S. President Obama and his wife accused of horrific immorality? 2008 saw the first in American history. A man, a convicted drug smuggler named Larry Sinclair, a gay man with a disability, stepped forward at the National Press Club and admitted he was paid to have homosexual relationships and participate in cocaine / cocaine shooting with Barack Obama, in a limousine in Chicago and in Sinclair’s hotels. room, at a time when he was an Illinois state senator in November 1999. That man, Sinclair, publicly accused Obama of hypocrisy. The name of the person and the date of origin of the item are public records, available via the Internet search. Also, at an official U.S. military gathering, Obama named his wife Michael after his election, not Michelle. This is also a matter of records. Moreover, in his fierce efforts to expand and legalize homosexual marriage, the LGBT agenda, and the legitimization of transsexual / transgender use of public toilets, he made it clear that the fruit he bore was an evil fruit. Would his approval of such horrible sins be because of his own practice regarding them? Would a Christian American president advocate such things? Recently, a very serious public statement by Joan Rivers, that “we all know that Michelle Obama is a transit (transgender person),” and her subsequent unexplained death due to lack of oxygen, are public evidence that requires further serious investigation. As for Obama as an undeclared Muslim, his ingenious acceptance of the Muslim Brotherhood, a notorious terrorist organization, shifted to the White House, allowing them to move freely from 2010 to 2015, and his continued wearing of the only Muslim ring, which he received in to his Muslim youth in Indonesia and changed size several times to fit the growing ring finger, indicated actions or fruits, indicating his true Muslim identity. All of this evidence and the evidence goes along with what the apostle Paul stated in 2 Thessalonians 2: 7-12 (KJV).
“For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he that letteth now let him go, until he be taken out of the way. And the wicked shall be revealed, which the Lord shall devour with the spirit of his mouth, and destroy him: with the brightness of his coming. the works of Satan with all the power and signs and lies of miracles, and all the delusion of unrighteousness in those who perish because they have not received the love of truth, that they may save them.Therefore God will send them a strong delusion to believe in a lie: they believed the truth, but they enjoyed injustice. “
Clearly, these last days are upon a few of Jesus ’disciples because they know the signs of the times and because they can notice the rapid fulfillment of the prophecy. Those many human beings that Paul mentioned in the previous Thessalonian letter do not care about the signs that so clearly indicate the rapid return of the Savior of the world. They do not believe in a God who returns wrath and justice, who came as a pure and unbaptized lamb into the world, as the Son of God, at the beginning of the 1st century. It was far from unbelievable, the injustices consumed by Sodom and Gomorrah are now accepted, believed and practiced by the vast majority of the unprepared pagan world of the 21st century, and tolerated by the indifference of most people who choose to call themselves Christians and disciples of Christ. For, as Jesus said in Matthew 7: 13-14, “Enter ye into the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction. Many shall enter in there: for strait is the gate, and strait is the way that leadeth.” to life, and there are few who find it. “Because of this admonition, Jesus continued in the same chapter and said,” Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are drawn by wolves. ” The truth of previously written writings is hard to bear.